<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Patrick Oden &#187; new atheism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patrickoden.com/tag/new-atheism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patrickoden.com</link>
	<description>The Common Lawyer, Now in Blog Form</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 04:36:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sophisticated Philosophical Arguments</title>
		<link>http://www.patrickoden.com/philosophy/sophisticated-philosophical-arguments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patrickoden.com/philosophy/sophisticated-philosophical-arguments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Oden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris hitchen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pseudo-philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[william lane craig]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patrickoden.com/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently watched a video on YouTube featuring William Lane Craig. His assertion was that the &#8220;new atheists&#8221; were rather not intellectually bright, and that they present no sophisticated philosophical arguments. The new atheists, he claims, are doing little more than rehashing arguments from the intellectual giants (my words) who were their predecessors, such as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patrickoden.com/philosophy/sophisticated-philosophical-arguments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
