<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Patrick Oden &#187; atheism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patrickoden.com/tag/atheism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patrickoden.com</link>
	<description>The Common Lawyer, Now in Blog Form</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 04:36:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sophisticated Philosophical Arguments</title>
		<link>http://www.patrickoden.com/philosophy/sophisticated-philosophical-arguments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patrickoden.com/philosophy/sophisticated-philosophical-arguments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Oden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris hitchen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pseudo-philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[william lane craig]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patrickoden.com/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently watched a video on YouTube featuring William Lane Craig. His assertion was that the &#8220;new atheists&#8221; were rather not intellectually bright, and that they present no sophisticated philosophical arguments. The new atheists, he claims, are doing little more than rehashing arguments from the intellectual giants (my words) who were their predecessors, such as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patrickoden.com/philosophy/sophisticated-philosophical-arguments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What If Atheism Kills Religion?</title>
		<link>http://www.patrickoden.com/philosophy/what-if-atheism-kills-religion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patrickoden.com/philosophy/what-if-atheism-kills-religion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Oden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patrickoden.com/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or, A Nostalgic Look Back on the Usefulness of Religion An atheist should not think of spirituality as useless any more than a capitalist should think of agriculture as useless. There are evolutionary reasons why religion developed. If religion and spirituality were biologically disadvantageous, shouldn&#8217;t they have been selected out? If there were no or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patrickoden.com/philosophy/what-if-atheism-kills-religion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
