Archive for April, 2010

FCC loses Net Neutrality case

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

I wonder if this will embolden the Internet Service Providers to revert back to their torrent-busting ways?

… [T]he U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled today that the agency lacks the authority to regulate the policies of Internet service providers.

In Comcast Corp. v. FCC, the court considered whether the FCC could bar Comcast from interfering with its customers’ use of peer-to-peer networking applications. The FCC acknowledged it had no explicit regulatory authority to do so, but the agency claimed it had “ancillary” jurisdiction over such network management practices.

The court didn’t buy it.

My greater concern is, if Congress fails to act to give the FCC regulatory authority over the ISPs, are we heading down that muddy slope toward content-discriminatory, multi-tiered access?

The Legal Times blog would seem to think so, calling Comcast Corp. v. FCC, “a decision with far-reaching implications for the future of the Internet.”

(via Legal Times blog)

BREAKING NEWS: GOP supports global trade!

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

In a shocking turn of events, Republicans are willing to buy from and sell to the global markets. News at 11.

I was reading an article over at Salon.com about the GOP buying t-shirts made in Honduras. They were basically taking the Democratic Party line and making fun of the GOP for buying non-American products to use in a rather childish t-shirt-based prank/retort to an earlier (and equally childish) t-shirt-based attempt at sloganeering by the Democrats.

The Salon article goes as far as explicitly spelling out for us that, unlike the t-shirts the Democrats bought, the Republican t-shirts were foreign-made and *gasp* not made by union workers. (more…)

Should have stopped at Hokey

Monday, April 5th, 2010

I think this absurdity speaks for itself.

My favorite part was where they all started shaking their heads, in and out, and all about. Maybe they’ll shake some intelligence loose in there. Could stand for a bit extra, it seems.

Filibuster of Supreme Court Justices

Monday, April 5th, 2010

I was reading over at my favorite right-wing political forum (the only one I can stand to read, because it’s the only one that doesn’t oppress dissenting opposing viewpoints), and I came across a topic by a short-sighted right-wing ideologue brilliant political strategist. Here’s his argument, syllogistically interpreted by me.

Premise the first:

Justice Stevens is about to retire.

Premise the second:

President Obama will nominate a new SCOTUS Justice.

Premise the third:

Republicans are a bunch of navel-gazers who are trying their best to remain the minority party. (Apparently.)

Conclusion? (more…)